I've been in that building before and it's cavernous. History dates back this feature to when smartphones stormed the world in I want to thank Gloria Candland who helped me to get a loan. Your blog is really excellent. She calls CBS apparently she heard that they were accepting calls from nobodies that morning - Jim Friedl, Joe Trachtenberg and that latin lady and gets to talk to host Bryant Gumbel, free trial sites dating good tie. You might want to reconsider because there is a long list of online dating websites with excellent reviews for Christians.
totally free dating sites
I spoke with Whitney Perry, the founder of the Single Online Dating Guide, who shared a great analogy. If you are wearing a dress that has zippers up the side, you can show what the dress looks like in a different way to different people by zipping it up a bit.
Free trial sites dating good tie same thing is true for online dating profiles. With different profiles you can show a different side to different people.
When you show a different side to your online dating profile, people get a better impression. Your profile is less like a resume and more like an item you are trying to sell. So, unless your marketing team is a super awesome, skilled team, online dating profiles should only show what you like. You are trying to get out of a space where people are going to feel the need to make assumptions about who you are.
And if they do, they are wrong. Let the world make assumptions about you, not about you. You can simply give people information. If you can give information and, more importantly, free trial sites dating good tie, if you can give more detailed information with your online profile, you are going to be a better prospect. If they think you are self-centered, disrespectful, or are going to leave, then they will never get to know you and you will be wasting their time.
You can show the world you are getting out of a relationship, but show them the reasons you left and the path you took to get out. If you can give enough information to make someone understand why you were leaving, the online dating profiles are a great starting point.
If you are a guy, think about the information you give. How you are going to make the woman understand why you left. Be open, honest, and willing to share everything you are going to do next. Read More. Online dating when to meet in person, free trial sites dating good tie. tinder dating. christian dating sites. ourtime dating. Which online dating sites are the best. Contact us. Newsletter Subscribe. Copyright All Right Reserved By Onine dating.
dating first advice
I spoke with Whitney Perry, the founder of the Single Online Dating Guide, who shared a great analogy. If you are wearing a dress that has zippers up the side, you can show what the dress looks like in a different way to different people by zipping it up a bit.
The same thing is true for online dating profiles. With different profiles you can show a different side to different people. When you show a different side to your online dating profile, people get a better impression. Your profile is less like a resume and more like an item you are trying to sell. So, unless your marketing team is a super awesome, skilled team, online dating profiles should only show what you like.
You are trying to get out of a space where people are going to feel the need to make assumptions about who you are. And if they do, they are wrong. The Bumble app places this time restriction to help you limit your choices to serious and dedicated matches only. What if you got a hookup date because you were horny? Things like these are time-barred. Do you procrastinate? Bumble is not the app for you, but Tinder may be your plug for online dating. If you are searching for short-term or long-term relationships, casual hookups, or long romantic relationships, then Tinder is one of the best online dating sites for you.
It allows for instant messaging and quick chatting and it is easy to use features make it the best dating site for newbies. Tinder profiles are precise, and this eradicates or, at the very least, minimizes indecisiveness.
This dating site allows for in-depth profiles, and it is the best plug to break the ice. The match name feature on CMB makes it almost impossible for users to skip their perfect match. Are you a person with a high-class profile? Be rest assured! The League is for you. Even among the best dating sites finding intellectuals with high intuitions and personalities poses a challenge.
But not with this dating site. If you have a homosexual orientation, this site will fit you because it is one of the best dating sites for lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgender, and queer communities.
Are you tired of having relationships in dating websites that never lead anywhere? It is one of the best online dating sites that have the largest population of users that tied the knot. Have you ever wondered what initiated dating apps? As far back as the 17th century, there have been subtle hints of online dating sites.
In , the first personal ad publication was openly made, where people could meet each other. In , there was a different approach.
This era was characterized by homosexuals who were scared of prosecution and had to resort to hidden coded messages on printed newspapers. A couple of decades later, in , Helen Morrison took a bold step to advertise her matchmaking intentions openly. Helen got attention quite alright, but it was not the kind she envisaged. Huffington post uploaded an article confirming that the mayor sent Helen to an asylum to rehabilitate for a month. Compare that era to this 21st Century when online dating is more than normal.
Marriage Gazette and The Wedding Bell were some of the publications that propagated the popularity of personal ads in the s. It slowly graduated from the upper class to the lower class and cut across both noblemen and women until those with intent to scam began to take advantage of people searching for genuine love. However, there is a slight similarity with this era and even the current best online dating sites. With the popularity and an increase of users comes fakes and scam users.
In the same era, around , the publications took a bigger step. It slowly deviated from a free matchup to a prepaid one. While it remained exclusively free for ladies, the Matrimonial News San Francisco made male singles pay a meager quarter. You should compare that to current premium subscriptions of the best dating sites. The next century came with a burning increase in the popularity of personal ads to the extent that even World War 1 soldiers engaged in it to connect with their wives, friends, and acquaintances.
If you were a person in need of a social partner, platonic, or romantic relationship in the s, it would have cost you a quarter to find a suitable match based on data from Introduction. It developed into an automated matchmaking site after a project review by Phil Fialer and Jim Harvey, who were Stanford students at the time. From 65 to 90s, the internet swept the world off its feet, leading to the development of the World Wide Web. The first online dating site was officially launched in , and it created an environment for full matches.
com made the subtle versions of online dating less archaic, and for a first, it nailed the matchmaking process. Age, race, sex, location, habits, and personality became criteria for matches, and this was more than an improvement. com has since been a template for all dating sites and hookup sites, even what now suffices as the best online dating sites. The best free online dating sites and fee-based dating websites are more often than not accompanied by dating apps. History dates back this feature to when smartphones stormed the world in Another remarkable feature of the year was the inception of the Zoosk dating app.
It was the first online dating site to take dating to the next level with the mobile app feature. Android and IOS users had access to Zoosk dating app from anywhere in the world using their smartphones. It is natural for humans to desire the best.
As regards online dating, the criteria for the best are not farfetched. The best online dating sites are ranked based on accessibility, mobility, design and interface, usability, and of course, safety and security. Special features and the existence of mobile apps are added benefits.
However, free dating websites cannot be disregarded. The best free online dating sites are websites that do not come off as cheap. The ability to render quality regardless is essential. To compare dating sites, it was also expedient to take note of reviews from its users, the spree of legit users and scam users, and of course, audience quality and monthly downloads. It is no news to all and sundry that not everyone on a dating site is on there to find love.
The interest of members of any dating website differs. This singular fact is the reason why online dating has grown to accommodate your needs. There are dating sites suitable for multi-purposes. For teenagers, we found dating sites like OkZoomer and Tinychat. Some of which include:. It is needless to point out the unfeasibility of listing over dating websites available worldwide. Summarily, online dating websites prepare for a wide range of possibilities. Even while searching for a dating app most suitable for finding a marriage partner or the most successful dating apps in the game, the clustered or less populated websites, there is always a legit online dating app available at your disposal.
It is important to reiterate that online dating is not restricted in possibilities. Your preference primarily determines your choice. Notwithstanding, here is a list of the most popular dating sites based on reviews made in Regardless, there are dating websites available just to meet your needs. You would have to skip the dates and deep conversations because chances are your match is on the dating site for the same reason.
Here is a trusted, safe, and secure list of online hookup sites. You may want to ejaculate without paying for an uber, burning fuel, or getting out of bed. iHookup allows for a sexting platform where you to please yourself however you deem necessary. Sorry for that little aside - I thought it was worth mentioning. Now back to "Theresa's eyewitness account:". It was a smaller plane. It was definitely a smaller plane. This is an example of a woman being instructed what to say. Either that or she realized that she forgot that she was supposed to say that word earlier.
I was pleasantly surprised at how well Bryant did his job on that day, in spite of his apparent vision issues. I suppose I should also make the point that Daryn Kagan from my previous article was also asking meaningful and intelligent questions over at CNN. Unfortunately, the only information Rose Arce was able to provide from wherever she was was a traffic report.
This indicates to me that not all media personnel were aware of the hoax at the time. Of course, unless they live in a cave, they must surely know the truth by now. This would make perfect sense if she were right next to the equipment they were using to review the replay before approving it for rebroadcast.
It's a shame that I haven't been able to identify who "Theresa Renault" really is, and who she was working for at the time. After her "performance," I'd be surprised if she's still alive today.
As bad as it was, they may have thrown her off the roof as soon as she hung up the phone. If you skipped over the building history and tenant list links I provided earlier, you may want to go back and have a look. I'd also appreciate any ideas with regard to "Theresa's" identity. The only other spelling of the last name I can think of is "Reno," and I came up empty on that one as well.
Update: Currently researching Theresa Renaud. Is this potentially the same individual who is currently a marketing director at Summit Systems Inc.
since Strangely, Zoominfo seems to indicate that she's a Senior VP at CBS then again, Zoominfo also lists Jack Renaud as working for Deutsch Advertising. Deutsch Advertising founder? Donny Deutsch. Donny interviewed Jim Fetzer in August, - no mention of Theresa Renaud. YouTube video of interview has been removed. Donny sold Deutsch Advertising to IPG in , according to Wikipedia.
Is this the same Theresa Renaud? I've been in that building before and it's cavernous. There are incredibly long hallways with very few people. As a carrier hotel, it's mostly floor after floor of "cages" full of telecom equipment. So anyway, if you wanted to set up shop with a bunch of computers and cameras no one would notice. Also, if you were planning on doing anything evil, no one would notice. Interesting find, SD. Oh, I noticed this same thing about TR, then I found that you already had posted it!
Plus, the work about the building is excellent. Good work. Yes, I knew it was fake because she says "there's another one, a plane just hit" right after the fireball comes through the NORTH side, so if she has seen a plane she would have noticed it before that. Then when she catches herself saying how much of the building she can see first "the top third" then the top "two thirds" then the top half, cuz she said it was half way down. Also notice the fake plane that comes after she is done, when BG says "can we see a plane?
Stilldiggin, you're great! Another facinating element of the exchange arises if you think about where the phone might have been relative to the window. Imagine, if you will, an unknown clerical employee goes to her office only to arrive in "The Twilite Zone" She hears an explosion that sounds just like a plane. She looks out her window to see the smoke from the wtc1 tower coming up wind from the hole made by that sound and the smoke has no shadow despite the angle of the sun.
Actually no, she saw that on TV. She can barely see a mark on the wtc1 tower from where she is nearly 2 miles away. But, she knows it must be burning in there, so she thinks the TV smoke is more accurate than what she sees.
She calls CBS apparently she heard that they were accepting calls from nobodies that morning - Jim Friedl, Joe Trachtenberg and that latin lady and gets to talk to host Bryant Gumbel. She is thinking, "what should I say in my 15 seconds of fame here? I doubt she is looking out the window, but, if she is, she is not really paying attention - she is thinking "Bryant Gumbel - wait till I tell my friends.
I think I have to pee. She is staring out the window with X-ray vision. Despite the overwhelming haze, oh, sorry again, that was the TV shot Damn WESCAMs - why do they spend so much for them if they can't get the color or focus right The day was actually crystal clear so she could see a plane flying in from 10 miles to the south - a small plane - it dissappears behind the towers and she sees a fireball that looks just like pumba with a hat at one brief moment.
Sorry, I keep mixing up TV with reality - she doesn't see any fireball - that was on TV. She sees the walls come out of wtc2. Well, you get it. Another nobody, whose voice sounds suspiciously like someone who had just been listening to a latin music station while Jim Ryan tried to get her attention.
Again, thanks for diggin'. Quick comment on spellings I have found Wendell also as Clyne. Theresa also as Renaud. And another Bryant Gumbel witness; Stewart Nurick, who was waiting a table in a SoHo restaurant. well, my sarcasm about Renauld being a nobody may have been misplaced! I just found a CBS article claiming Theresa Renaud, wife of The Early Show producer Jack Renaud, is a vice president at Deutsch Advertising in Chelsea.
She was live on the phone and dramatically described the impact of the second plane. She, too, lost a close friend who worked at KBW. Stewart Nurick the waiter was a former intern of the Early Show Stranger and stranger.
Hi, Added a new value add to my blog this weekend - a news widget from www. I always wanted to show latest news for my keywords in my sidebar. It was very easy with this widget. Just a small copy paste and it was done.
Great indeed. hi this is theresa renaud. if only that morning had been faked. i still work at 8th avenue. every morning at I look out at that empty hole on the horizon and say a prayer for those we lost. Prove you are Theresa Renaud. You can't. And if you are - why should we trust you - explain your hesitation while speaking and your very scripted dialogue on the phone.
No normal person speaks like that. Theresa Renaud in two places at the same time? it seems that theresa renaund is in two seperate locations about 2 miles apart at the same time on as well as calling CBS as a live witness from Chelsea, she is also filming the attack on the WTC out of the window of her home 36 floors up and 5oo yards away from the north tower but this time she's apparently called "Bri" and the video she filmed is on google video, it's called "What we saw - Bob and Bri" i'm not the first to notice this, but the voice is exactly the same i thought it may be of interest to any of you who have not seen this footage.
I know the parties involved here, personally. Thanks for uncovering the falsehood. Yes, it agree also. hello there, I really like this blog because is a slightly atypical blog, since most of them are about nature workshops, and also I enjoy to read something about it. Theresa was not in two places at the same time. The video that you all posted was shot from two or three blocks south of the World Trade Centers.
Also, the person that is speaking in the video is not Theresa Renault. How can she be recording herself and not recording herself talking to Bryant Gumble at the same time? That would most certainly be on the video. The people who made the video gasp when the second plane hit. As far as I am concerned, Theresa Renault didn't gasp on television, she said "Oh there's another one, another plane just hit!
The ABC shot at the time of the second plane crash has quite clearly the American Airlines flight being flown directly into the building, WTC 2. Not to mention that in the shot, World Trade Center 1 is obscuring the view of the second tower, hence her delay of her reaction. Theresa Renault wasn't told what to say. Have you all ever heard of the word "emotion" or "fear?
Theresa Renault was simply stuttering her words and talking in a weird way because she was SCARED, frightened at the sight she has just seen, not to mention confused as to what is going on. Yes, that's what is being said here. She was confused about what was going on. So for her to be presented as an accurate eye-witness of both plane hits just because she has ties to people at cbs and works in a tall building is a mistake. Difficult situation it was specially when the second plane crashed on the tower, I had never seen something like that before I'd like to create a conscience of those events.
Hello, i would like to read more about this interesting topic, i think that this post is very good. Interesting thesis. Thought it is nice to see different peoples perspective on certain topics. So thanks for sharing. Wow, nice post,there are many person searching about that now they will find enough resources by your post. Thank you for sharing to us. Please one more post about that.. I would like read more information about this, is very interesting!
Thanks for the information. A worth bookmarking blog. I would be reading your articles regularly from now on. so your point is that because a plane would appear small on this tiny image on a computer screen it would be really small in real life if you were looking directly out the window at it? ever look up in the sky and see an airplane? obviously not, because airplanes are so far up in the sky that they're INVISIBLE, right?
i could look at a video from that angle on a screen the same size and clearly see the plane fly into the building. in fact, i just did, as bryant gumble narrated. now imagine that IN PERSON.
you also think it's odd that she stammered and was somewhat speechless and flustered? she had just witnessed an event that had at that point already obviously killed at least dozens of people. it also slammed home the reality that we all realized watching it at home, this was officially a terrorist attack.
basically she had just seen a mass murder and you expect her to be calm and composed?
No comments:
Post a Comment